Court rules on Gibraltar stadium plans

Article posted by Coliseum, September 22^nd, 2025

Image: AZO Arquitectos

The Gibraltar Football Association can push ahead with redevelopment of Victoria Stadium after a court challenge against the project was thrown out.

GBC said the Supreme Court has dismissed a constitutional challenge brought by VSB Limited, operators of the bar El Murga, against the Government over its tenancy at the Victoria Stadium.

The dispute arose after the Governor issued a certificate in December 2024 under section 66 of the Landlord and Tenant Act, ahead of the Stadium re-development.

The provision in the Landlord and Tenant Act allows the early termination of business tenancies in the public interest, where redevelopment is required.

The move was aimed at enabling the Gibraltar Football Association to redevelop the site into a UEFA Category 4 national stadium. Demolition work began earlier this year.

The 5,000-capacity Victoria Stadium is a multipurpose stadium in Gibraltar. It is currently used mostly for football matches, but also hosts the annual Gibraltar Music Festival.

It is located close to Gibraltar Airport just off Winston Churchill Avenue. It was named after the wife of Gibraltarian philanthropist John Mackintosh.

Built in 1926 as a military sports ground, it was redeveloped in 1970 for use by the local population.

Further improvements came in the 1990s but everything changed in May 2013 when the GFA became a full member of UEFA.

The stadium’s fate was sealed, and in 2017, when the Government announced plans to build the new UEFA -approved category 4 stadium.

The news that plans to redevelop the stadium are on schedule will be welcome after years of delays and controversies related to funding, location the design and size.

VSB argued that section 66 was unconstitutional, claiming it gave the Governor sweeping powers without judicial oversight, created institutional bias, and failed to provide adequate compensation compared to tenants of private landlords.

The company also questioned whether the Government held sufficient ownership of the site, pointing to agreements with the Gibraltar Football Association that it said amounted to a lease.

The case was defended by Lord Pannick KC and Jason Pobjoy KC, who argued that judicial review and constitutional motions provided sufficient court oversight, and that the agreements with the GFA created only licences, not leases.

Chief Justice Anthony Dudley agreed with the Government.

He ruled that judicial review satisfies constitutional requirements for access to the courts, and that the Governor’s role does not breach the standard of impartiality, given the ultimate jurisdiction of the courts.

On the question of ownership, he said agreements with the GFA did not transfer exclusive possession, meaning the Government remained landlord and entitled to act under section 66. VSB’s claim was dismissed.

Continue to follow Coliseum for latest updates on venues business news. Coliseum is dedicated towards building the best global community of sports and entertainment venue executives and professionals creating better and more profitable venues.

Become a member of the only Global Sports Venue Alliance and connect with stadiums, arenas and experts from around the world. Apply for membership at coliseum-online.com/alliance and make use of the 365Coliseum Business.

Watch 500+ member-exclusive videos with valuable tips for your venue