London Stadium naming rights issue hit new low

Image: West Ham United

A fresh row has broken out over the former Olympic stadium (London Stadium in United Kingdom) after the Premier League team West Ham United F.C. warned the prospect of securing naming rights was “dwindling to zero”.

‘Evening Standard’ stated that the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has offered to help end a 10-year search for a sponsor after West Ham’s Vice-Chair Baroness Brady claimed the £4m a year being sought in return for renaming the stadium after a sponsor was “too high”.

The 66,000-capacity London Stadium is a multipurpose outdoor stadium at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park in the Stratford district of London, UK. It is located in the Lower Lea Valley, six miles East of Central London.

The West Ham United Football Club is an English professional football club that plays its home matches in Stratford, East London (UK). The club competes in the Premier League, the top tier of English football. The club plays at the London Stadium, having moved from their former home, the Boleyn Ground, in 2016.

‘Evening Standard’ further stated that West Ham rents the stadium under a 99-year lease but it costs the London taxpayer about £17m a year to keep it open, according to the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) which oversees the Olympic Park.

London (UK)-based the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) is an organization established in 2012, replacing the Olympic Park Legacy Company and the planning powers of the Olympic Delivery Authority. It was formed as a Mayoral development corporation under the powers of the Localism Act 2011.

It is estimated that £40m has been lost in potential income due to the failure to find a sponsor for the venue, now known as the London Stadium.

Two months ago Lyn Garner, the LLDC Chief Executive, said the naming rights were worth £4m a year – but suggested a larger sum could be secured if shirt sponsorship, or a deal including the naming of other venues in the Olympic Park, could be struck.

Garner told a City Hall meeting, “If West Ham wanted to pay me £4m a year for the right to sell the naming rights, then we can have a conversation. However, what I cannot do is sell the naming rights off cheaply.”

But this sparked a furious response from Baroness Brady, who said the naming rights were only worth £2m a year and there was an attempt to sell them to West Ham “at an inflated price”.

In a five-page letter, she claimed there had been an unfair suggestion that the stadium “could not attract the best brands because West Ham United is not as attractive as other clubs”.

She said that West Ham was entitled to a share of any deal but added, “The time has come where the prospect of naming rights revenue for West Ham United is dwindling to zero. We will be going to market shortly for a new primary sponsor. The window to sell the naming rights will be impacted once we engage a fresh front of shirt brand partner. There needs to be an acceptance that the value in stadium naming rights is not what it once was. Everyone needs to be realistic. Brand partnership with Premier League clubs is in high demand. Stadium naming sponsorship on its own is not.”

Baroness Brady said the club was willing to act as an agent to find a sponsor and called for a “fresh approach” on how the stadium is run.

Khan was urged at a London Assembly meeting recently by Lib-Dem Caroline Pidgeon to “give impetus” to the search for a stadium sponsor.

Pidgeon asked the Mayor, “Doesn’t it makes sense to get everyone round the table and see if we can use West Ham’s professional skills to try and get that deal, because that helps the taxpayer?”

Khan, who has been involved in the stadium’s hosting of American football and baseball games, said, “I’m more than happy to get involved, as and when I’m advised it’s the right time to do so. We have also got to be careful not to scare away somebody potentially thinking about being a sponsor by giving the impression we are at daggers. We really aren’t. West Ham has made huge progress working with us in the last few years.”

A West Ham spokesman said, “West Ham United has consistently maintained that the income generated at the stadium could be far higher. We have made clear that we are open to a new approach and are willing to help grow revenues and reduce costs, while improving the London Stadium experience for West Ham United supporters and other visitors. As far as we are concerned, no option is off the table. We welcome dialog with the Mayor to realize the potential of this incredible, iconic asset for the capital.”

Continue to follow Coliseum for latest updates on venues business news. Coliseum is dedicated towards building the best global community of sports and entertainment venue executives and professionals creating better and more profitable venues.

Become a member of the only Global Sports Venue Alliance and connect with stadiums, arenas and experts from around the world. Apply for membership at coliseum-online.com/alliance and make use of the 365Coliseum Business.

• Tags »
• London Stadium
• naming rights

« Previous News: Venues across globe named after ‘King’ Pelé
» Next News: In-limbo Nelson Mandela Stadium open doors!