UCLA dragged to court over ‘trust betrayal’

Article posted by Coliseum, November 7^th, 2025

Image: Coliseum GSVA

The City of Pasadena (Los Angeles, California, US) and the Rose Bowl Operating Company filed a lawsuit recently to force the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) to honor the remaining two decades of its contract and keep Bruins football games in the historic stadium (Rose Bowl) through 2044.

‘Los Angeles Times’ stated that the complaint, filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against UCLA and the University of California Regents (governing body), alleges that the university has been “unequivocally expressing its intent to abandon the Rose Bowl Stadium and relocate its home football games to the 70,240-capacity SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, calling it “a profound betrayal of trust”.

The UCLA Bruins football program represents the University of California, Los Angeles, in college football.

The Rose Bowl is an outdoor athletic stadium located in Pasadena, California, United States. Opened in October 1922, the stadium is recognized as a National Historic Landmark and a California Historic Civil Engineering landmark. With a modern all-seated capacity of 89,702 the Rose Bowl is the 20^th-largest stadium in the world and the 11^th-largest stadium in the United States.

‘Los Angeles Times’ further stated that the UCLA’s lease runs through June 30^th, 2044, and the Pasadena officials say the taxpayers have invested more than $150 million in stadium renovations while recently refinancing an additional $130 million in bonds for additional capital improvements.

The filing reads, “This lawsuit arises in an era when money too often eclipses meaning and the pursuit of profit threatens to erase the very traditions that breathe life into the institutions. Some commitments are too fundamental to be traded away.”

The filing alleges that the UCLA, after years of public assurances that it is staying, has now “chosen to disregard those promises” and has formally notified the plaintiffs that it is “moving on” and that “there’s no way we’re staying long term”.

Said Mary Osako, UCLA Vice-Chancellor for Strategic Communications, “While we continue to evaluate the long-term arrangement for the UCLA football home games no decision has been made.”

Although the UCLA has yet to file a formal response to the lawsuit the university disputed the allegations in an exhibit included in the filing. In a letter to Pasadena’s attorney, Nima Mohebbi, UCLA Outside Counsel David L. Schrader wrote in March that the university has not violated the agreement and that “preliminary discussions” that contemplate a move “do not constitute a material breach for which the Rose Bowl Operating Company (RBOC) would be entitled to a legal or equitable remedy.”

Schrader wrote that the UCLA “continues to evaluate strategic goals and how to be fiscally responsible and best fulfill its mission”.

The lawsuit asks for a court order that requires the UCLA to honor the entirety of its lease.

The filing contends that it would be devastating to Pasadena and the stadium were UCLA to violate the agreement, that the harm caused to the City and its residents “could easily exceed a billion dollars [or more]”, and that monetary damages could never truly remedy UCLA’s conduct.

Russell Korobkin, a Professor in the UCLA School of Law who specializes in contracts and negotiation, said the lawsuit appeared to be a pre-emptive move by the Rose Bowl to prevent the UCLA from simply making a payout as part of a move to a new football home.

Added Korobkin, “The Rose Bowl is saying, by filing the suit, ‘We don’t want your money, we’re going to try to get a court to order you to stay and play at the Rose Bowl. So, that really seems to be ultimately what’s at stake here. One can’t answer this question with complete confidence but it would just be my prediction that they will not be able to get a specific performance order, that they could probably only recover monetary damages” from the UCLA.

An order requiring UCLA to remain at the Rose Bowl could be granted, Korobkin said, “if you can prove that monetary damages would be inadequate to compensate you for your harm, and so the Rose Bowl people put this in the contract, insisted on this in the contract, to help their argument to the court that monetary damages would be inadequate here, but that statement is not legally binding on the court – that is, the court still has to independently decide if that’s true.”

Korobkin said one aspect of the case that makes it different from other breach-of-contract situations is the involvement of a Government entity – the City of Pasadena – which could complicate efforts to reach a negotiated settlement.

Commented Korobkin, “They point out in their complaint that if the UCLA were to leave they not only lose revenue but they lose sort of prestige and also sort of the surrounding businesses and other entities in Pasadena, people who pay taxes in Pasadena, people who vote in Pasadena, would be hurt by this and that the Rose Bowl cares about those people as well, right? If the Rose Bowl were a privately-held entity I would feel pretty confident that [a settlement] would be the likely result, but given that it’s owned by the public and it has this broader range of interests and concerns, it doesn’t seem certain to me – although it’s still possible.”

Home attendance at a stadium located 26 miles from the campus has been a deepening concern in recent seasons for the UCLA. The team has averaged 35,253 fans for its four home games this season putting it on track for an all-time low at the Rose Bowl.

Continue to follow Coliseum for latest updates on venues business news. Coliseum is dedicated towards building the best global community of sports and entertainment venue executives and professionals creating better and more profitable venues.

Become a member of the only Global Sports Venue Alliance and connect with stadiums, arenas and experts from around the world. Apply for membership at coliseum-online.com/alliance and make use of the 365Coliseum Business.

Watch 500+ member-exclusive videos with valuable tips for your venue