LA Rams move to SoFi Stadium comes at a price



Linkedin Twitter

NFL and Rams paying big amount to St. Louis Image: Robin Alam, AOL

The Los Angeles Rams and the National Football League (NFL) agreed recently to pay $790 million to settle a lawsuit over the team’s departure from St. Louis (US), enabling Rams owner Stan Kroenke and the league to avoid the spectacle of a St. Louis trial slated for December, just before the Super Bowl at Kroenke’s showcase stadium (SoFi Stadium) in Inglewood, US.

The ‘Los Angeles Times’ stated that under the terms of the settlement, St. Louis gets the money no later than Christmas Eve, with Kroenke and the league left to decide how much of the payment should be allocated to the Rams and how much to the NFL and other owners.

The Los Angeles Rams are a professional American football team based in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The Rams compete in the National Football League (NFL) as a member of the National Football Conference (NFC) West division. The Rams play their home games at the SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, which they share with the Los Angeles Chargers.

The 70,240-capacity SoFi Stadium is a stadium and entertainment complex in Inglewood, California, United States. It is located at the former site of the Hollywood Park Racetrack, 3 miles from the Los Angeles International Airport, and immediately Southeast of The Forum indoor arena.

The National Football League (NFL) is a professional American football league consisting of 32 teams, divided equally between the National Football Conference and the American Football Conference.

The ‘Los Angeles Times’ further stated that the lawsuit, filed in 2017, alleged that the Rams’ move from St. Louis to Los Angeles violated the NFL’s relocation policy, under which the team and the league should have made every reasonable effort to keep the team in St. Louis. The settlement specifically says no party acknowledges any liability, a critical need for the NFL since Oakland has sued the league on similar grounds over the Raiders’ departure. Oakland lost, but an appeal is pending.

The Rams made no immediate comment. The league said in a statement it appreciated “the effort by all parties to reach a settlement”.

In a joint statement, the Mayor of the City of St. Louis, Tishaura Jones, and the Executive of the County of St. Louis, Sam Page, said the settlement “Closes a long chapter for our region, securing hundreds of millions of dollars for our communities while avoiding the uncertainty of the trial and appellate process”. The duo said they were “still determining” what to do with the money.

The settlement does not include an expansion team for St. Louis. The settlement provides that 35 percent of the payment – $276.5 million – be awarded to the attorneys representing St. Louis.

The Rams argued that when St. Louis declined to make $700 million in improvements to the team’s stadium there, a lease provision was triggered that enabled the team to end the lease and leave town.

St. Louis argued that while the provision ended the lease, it did not absolve the Rams from negotiating with the City thereafter. The City said it had spent millions on proposals for a new stadium, secured a naming-rights sponsor and pursued hundreds of millions in public funding while the Rams already had decided to leave for Los Angeles, even as team and league officials stated otherwise.

The NFL asked the St. Louis Circuit Court to throw out the lawsuit, to order private arbitration and to move any trial out of St. Louis. The court declined all three requests, the rulings were sustained on appeal.

The NFL appeared resigned to losing before a hometown jury but was confident it could be successful on appeal, at least in having the damages significantly reduced. St. Louis had sought damages in the range of $4 billion, including payment equivalent to the relocation fee the NFL assessed the Rams and the increase in franchise value resulting from the move to Los Angeles.

The settlement closes the case for St. Louis, but not for the NFL. Before NFL owners approved the Rams’ move, Kroenke signed an indemnification agreement that obligated him to pay the “costs, including legal fees and other litigation expenses” to defend any challenge to a move.

Kroenke has informed fellow owners he does not believe the legal “costs” covered under the indemnity extend to damages, and he had asked them to share in the cost of a settlement. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has the final say over who pays what under the indemnification agreement, but Kroenke could sue in the absence of what he considers a reasonable deal.

That scenario means that even the settlement might not keep the NFL out of court over the St. Louis deal, with Kroenke opposing fellow owners instead of St. Louis. That prospect comes at an uncomfortable time for the NFL, which is challenging a House Oversight Committee request for documents related to its investigation into the Washington Football Team.

The NFL has declined to release the results of its investigation, intended to explore what two Congresswomen called “widespread abusive workplace conduct” with the team. Former Las Vegas Raiders (NFL team) coach Jon Gruden has sued the league, alleging his firing resulted from the league leaking emails it had obtained through that investigation.

In the Southland, meanwhile, the total cost of bringing back the Super Bowl for the first time since 1993 has topped $6 billion.

It cost $5 billion for Kroenke to build Sofi Stadium, $550 million paid by Kroenke as a relocation fee and $790 million for the Rams and the NFL to settle the St. Louis lawsuit.

How much of that $6.34 billion ultimately will be paid by Kroenke is uncertain. He and the NFL have yet to agree how to divide the $790-million settlement. In terms of the stadium, according to their relocation application to the NFL, the Rams said Kroenke would “invest over $800 million in equity in the project and has the ability to service the debt on the facility”.

How much of that $6.34 billion will be paid by Los Angeles taxpayers is certain: $0.

Continue to follow Coliseum for latest updates on venues business news. Coliseum is dedicated towards building the best global community of sports and entertainment venue executives and professionals creating better and more profitable venues.

Become a member of the only Global Sports Venue Alliance and connect with stadiums, arenas and experts from around the world. Apply for membership at coliseum-online.com/alliance and make use of the 365Coliseum Business.

Watch 150 member-exclusive videos with valuable tips for your venue



« Previous News:
» Next News:



More News

Plymouth Argyle stadium improvements

Home Park ‘look and feel’ to get a leg-up

Published: January 17th, 2022

The League One club Plymouth Argyle F.C. (UK) has revealed that the club will imminently embark... » Read more

UK to outline new security measures for venues

UK prescription for venues on terror attacks

Published: January 17th, 2022

Plans to impose a legal duty on venues to provide security against terror attacks have been... » Read more

Anheuser-Busch and MSG renew partnership

MSG Sports extends Anheuser-Busch ties

Published: January 17th, 2022

Madison Square Garden (MSG) Sports (US), the owner of the National Hockey League (NHL) team New... » Read more

France to host Rugby League World Cup 2025

Rugby World Cup for France after 50 years

Published: January 17th, 2022

It is official, the French Rugby League will host the 2025 Rugby League World Cup (including both... » Read more


Receive global sports venue NEWS twice a week in your inbox